As most of you will know, I am ga-ga about architecture. Tonight on Ovation TV, I watched the most fascinating program about one of the world’s most talented and visionary builders/designers Daniel Libeskind. At the very end of the program they displayed the plans Mr. Libeskind has submitted for this mega project…it was stunning.
If you have been following the ever evolving story about the re-development of the World Trade Center site, you may recall that it was Daniel who won the design competition to rebuild the complex. His proposal, the centerpiece of which, was a 1776 ft. tall skyscraper with a deconstructed cathedralesque spire – was as bold as it was inspiring. Unfortunately, what Daniel actually won in that competition was the right to design the physical “floor-plan” of where buildings will actually be built – but not the right to actually design those buildings. Or at least, this is the story that the New York Redevelopment board would have us believe. I believe that the truth of the matter is that the the New York “powers-that-be” are notorious for attracting world-class architects, then chewing them up and spitting them back
into the wind. Daniel’s design for the Freedom tower was simply too radical, too extreme….too good for New York. Those powers-that-be are more fond of square towers with flat glass and block walls. Deconstructed was not New York – and so they asked Libeskind to go back to the drawing board and redesign the tower – but this time with the “assistance” of another major architect from a rival firm. An architect whose aesthetic is less about art or beauty, but rather an adherence to maintaining the status quo. After a period of collaboration, city officials gradually erased all of Libeskind’s influence. The plan on the drafting board today for the totally unremarkable tower is solely the design of David Childs of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. Libeskind is only menially involved in the rebuilding in that his name is still on record as having won the international competition, and, his original space planning for the footprint of the buildings and memorials is still being honored. This entire debacle is quite sad for a man of Libeskind’s sensibility. But he was not undone. Not by a long-shot. In addition to now building skyscrapers, museums and housing projects in all parts of the globe, the basic design of the original Freedom Tower may still be realized in the amazing principality of Monaco. Although I have not yet found on-line pictures of the proposal, the piece de resistance looks to be a soaring tower that should have been built on ground zero. New York’s loss just might be Monaco’s gain.
STUDIO DANIEL LIBESKIND, ONE OF TWO LEADERS IN COMPETITION FOR MONACO ON-SEA DEVELOPMENT
Monaco (October 1, 2008) – World renowned architects Daniel Libeskind and Norman Foster are leading the race to build a major maritime extension to the Mediterranean state of Monaco. The competition was initiated in 2006 when Prince Albert II announced plans to extend the principality by creating a new peninsula, roughly the size of 20 football fields, extending into the sea from below the world famous Monte Carlo casino.
The Monaco development is set to cover 275,000 square meters (3 million square feet) of housing, retail and tourist facilities, as well as a flagship new public building – details of which have yet to be released.
Monaco Prime Minister Jean-Paul Proust recently announced that designs by Daniel Libeskind and Norman Foster stood out among the five shorlisted bids for their technical and environmental qualities.
Prime Minister Proust has yet to release a decision, but said that Monaco authorities would review all bids in the light of the global economic crisis to ensure that they are fiscally sound.
Libeskind’s project is being championed by the Monte-Carlo Sea Land consortium, made up of Japanese architect Arata Isozaki and Dutch and Belgian building groups Van Oord-Dragados and BESIX.
The winner of the Monaco competition will be announced later this year.


